I really don’t know whom to be pissed at here…

Earlier today, Adrants reported that Southwest Airlines rejected the new PETA ad which features a hot chick in her underwear thanks to the new full body scanners at the airport  from it’s in-flight magazine because it was, “too provocative to run in our publication.”

First of all, screw you Southwest: Your airline is basically a Grayhound bus with wings that attracts the lowest rung of travel passenger.  I blame you guys for making the travel industry too damn competitive to the point where we’re all shuffling through the airport with sack lunches unless you can trick your boss into letting you fly business class.  The very least you can do is allowing me one x-ray photo of a hot chick in her skivvies.

Second of all, screw you PETA: You know exactly what you’re doing, so don’t try and feed the world quotes like this one, “Our ad is less sensational than many of Southwest’s own promotions. The airline may have canned it because the company is based in Dallas, the heart of the beef belt.”  The ad was rejected because it has a hot chick in her underwear.  I mean, damn, I think you can see ariola and part of an ass cheek.  You fuckers do this every damn time: you make the most outrageous ads just so they get rejected and then you can scream about how you’re being repressed like that peasant guy from Holy Grail.  You’re being a dick on purpose and it’s getting friggin’ old.

Lastly, Adrants… I can’t really tell if you were just screwing around here, so you’re the least of my worries right now.  At the end of your post you say, “PETA may have a point when it claims Southwest might be talking out of both sides of its mouth. One need only take a look at Hostesses in Hotpants and Don’t #$*!% Me Over.”  So, the hotpants one came out in 1972, so no, not an issue.  The Don’t Fuck Me Over one, that’s actually not the same at all… it’s cussing, and it’s fake cussing at that; the other one is a hot chick in her underwear.  Sure, they are both “risque!”, but it’s not the same thing.  That would be like putting up a picture of Richard Nixon and a picture of someone’s junk in an ad and saying, “what? they’re both dicks?!?”

Basically, y’all suck.