<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dead Tree Media - Traditional Advertising Reviewed by an Internet Marketer &#187; Wall Street Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/tag/wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deadtreemedia.com</link>
	<description>This blog is where I talk about traditional media (print, TV, radio, etc.) from the perspective of an internet media guy (me).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ (wha?) rates the best and worst advertising of 2009</title>
		<link>http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/wsj-wha-rates-the-best-and-worst-advertising-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/wsj-wha-rates-the-best-and-worst-advertising-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deadtreemedia.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dead Tree Media just arrived on the scene, so we&#8217;re not going to do a &#8220;Best of 2009&#8243; edition.  Partly because it would be presumptuous, but mostly because it sounds like work.  But that won&#8217;t stop us from linking to a few Best Of&#8217;s to fill in some dead space on the site. Wall Street [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/guest-post-accenture-proves-that-the-best-jokes-are-accidental/' rel='bookmark' title='Guest Post: Accenture proves that the best jokes are accidental&#8230;'>Guest Post: Accenture proves that the best jokes are accidental&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/all-of-tiger-wood%e2%80%99s-dead-tree-friends-are-running-for-the-hills%e2%80%a6/' rel='bookmark' title='All of Tiger Wood’s dead tree friends are running for the hills…'>All of Tiger Wood’s dead tree friends are running for the hills…</a></li>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/almost-absolutely-not-the-15-worst-movie-taglines-ever-written/' rel='bookmark' title='Almost absolutely NOT the 15 Worst Movie Taglines Ever Written'>Almost absolutely NOT the 15 Worst Movie Taglines Ever Written</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dead Tree Media just arrived on the scene, so we&#8217;re not going to do a &#8220;Best of 2009&#8243; edition.  Partly because it would be presumptuous, but mostly because it sounds like work.  But that won&#8217;t stop us from linking to a few Best Of&#8217;s to fill in some dead space on the site.</p>
<p>Wall Street Journal, one of the old ladies of the Dead Trees, posted its list of the Best and Worst Ads of 2009 (<a href="http://bit.ly/86d8Ro" target="_blank">link</a>).  It&#8217;s a fairly decent review of the year for sure.  I can&#8217;t agree with them on some of the non-dead tree winners (the skating babies thing was cute, but it was a novelty at best). but overall it&#8217;s a decent read.</p>
<p>The one I&#8217;m having a little problem with was giving Accenture the red ass for its Tiger Woods campaign simply <em>because</em> it had Tiger Woods in it now.  Turns out that campaign has been running for over six years and nobody seemed to have a problem with it until we found out that Tiger was a bigger hit with the ladies that we would have guessed.  I mean, you could have given it a &#8220;worst&#8221; rating because the ads are kind of poorly written and unimaginative, but to say they are suddenly bad because of Tiger, that&#8217;s just lazy.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t tolerate laziness on this site and&#8230; what? Oh I led with lazy. Shit, never mind&#8230;</p>
<p>J.</p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/guest-post-accenture-proves-that-the-best-jokes-are-accidental/' rel='bookmark' title='Guest Post: Accenture proves that the best jokes are accidental&#8230;'>Guest Post: Accenture proves that the best jokes are accidental&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/all-of-tiger-wood%e2%80%99s-dead-tree-friends-are-running-for-the-hills%e2%80%a6/' rel='bookmark' title='All of Tiger Wood’s dead tree friends are running for the hills…'>All of Tiger Wood’s dead tree friends are running for the hills…</a></li>
<li><a href='http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/almost-absolutely-not-the-15-worst-movie-taglines-ever-written/' rel='bookmark' title='Almost absolutely NOT the 15 Worst Movie Taglines Ever Written'>Almost absolutely NOT the 15 Worst Movie Taglines Ever Written</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deadtreemedia.com/index.php/all-posts/wsj-wha-rates-the-best-and-worst-advertising-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

